Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: Updates to rich snippets

April 17th, 2012 § § permalink

More details regarding implementation here

Incoming search terms:

Google Panda Strategy: UX is the new SEO

March 4th, 2012 § § permalink

92858993 Google Panda Strategy: UX is the new SEO

After the last year’s Google Panda “massacre” a new business model has emerged: strategies to fight off Google Panda. Most of the documents I have seen are simple scams that refurbish SEO garbage that has been floating on the internet since the SEO term has been coined. If you are tired of seeing and paying for the same WSO special offers and you would like to read something valuable go to Techcrunch and read this excellent case study from the real world written by the CEO of viewpoints.com. You will learn there that the new SEO strategies focus not on volume and shady backlinks but on great user experience. And this is the winning strategy because by focusing on the user you can finally address the “secret” factors of search engine rankings:
  • Returning visitors
  • Time on site
  • Bounce rate
  • Social markers
 

Incoming search terms:

Romanians are search engine spammers…

January 30th, 2012 § § permalink

…or at least this seems to be result of a marketing campaign. The idea was simple: When you search in Google for “Romanians are…”(in english, romanian and other languages), the suggestions were not so flattering (in fact they are not for most countries which in itself is a mirror of the racism that’s on all of us). In order to change that, an advertising agency created a campaign to motivate people to mass search for more positive terms. The results:

394205 10150643589149278 47989124277 12280408 161397595 n Romanians are search engine spammers...

This can be considered a harmless and moral cause, but the same were many other Google Bombs that were removed by Google. Is it fair to game (in public) the autosuggestion results? What if KFC tried to game his autosuggestion from “KFC is bad” to “KFC is healthy”? On the other side, the autosuggestions, in many cases of “natural search” (questions/affirmations), are simply idiotic. Most likely this is because only idiotic people use natural language searches.  

Incoming search terms:

SEO accidents: wrong title in SERPS

September 17th, 2011 § § permalink

A few days ago had a talk with a client that had an unexplainable issue: while googling for his company name, the google result has showing instead of the homepagethe sequence: “[CompanyName] Logo”.

What happened in fact:

  • the sequence “[CompanyName] Logo” was extracted from the alt tag of the logo
  • page titles all over the site were the same
  • page titles were very large and the [CompanyName] was used as a suffix

The recommandations that fixed the issue in a few days were:

  • Use unique titles on all the pages of the website
  • Use smaller page titles (up to 70 characters)
  • On the homepage use the company name as a prefix instead of a suffix and on all the others keep it as it was
  • Try a force reindexing of the website using the Fetch as Googlebot option from the webmaster tools

Incoming search terms:

Article pagination for SEO

November 28th, 2010 § § permalink

On Webmaster World there is a pretty good thread showing a step by step guide on how to implement pagination for long articles (over 500-700 words) for SEO purposes. Among the reasons you would want to do that:
  • Increase the volume of unique content
  • Increase the pageviews (if you are using a CPM advertising solution this would almost double your income)
  • Decrease the bouncerate on your website (call me paranoid but I bet the Google uses that as a quality factor in organic ranking).
Among the biggest issues with this, is how you handle comments. Basically you have to choose from 4 options:
  • Have the same comments on all the newly created pages (for wordpress i think this is the only available solution)
  • Have each part have its own comments (there is no plugin as far as i know for wordpress but in this case you can simply create a new post for each part and link them after you are done)
  • Have the comments separated from the content (similar to a forum, where the article title is the name of the thread)
Here are the main steps from the WW forum:
  1. Page 1 naturally enough uses the overall title of the article for both its title tag and header, and has a unique meta-description.
  2. Every internal page then has its own unique title and header tag h1. These are based on the first SUB-head for that section of the article. This means more keyword research and writing of subheads than would normally be the case. If the article is considered as a whole, then an h2 tag would seem more accurate semantically. But Google looks at the semantic structure one URL at a time, not for the overall multi-URL article. Most pages also include internal subheads, and these are style as h2
  3. On each internal page, there is also a “pre-head” that does use the article title from page 1 in a small font. This pre-head does not use a header tag of any kind, just a CSS style. This pre-head article title is at the top as a navigation cue for the user.
  4. An additional navigation cue is that the unique page titles each begin with the numeral “2.” or “3.”
  5. Each internal page also has a unique meta description, one that summarizes that page specifically, rather than summarizing the overall article.
  6. Every page of the article links to every other page at the top and the bottom. None of this anemic “Back | Next” junk. There’s a complete page choice shown on everywhere – 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6| 7 – and there is also a centered link at the end of each page: Next: Linked title of the next page goes here
  7. The linked numbers that are used as on-page navigation also include a title attribute that matches the title tag of the target page. I’m still not sure what a title attribute does for Google exactly, if anything, but the tool tip that it generates is a major aid for the reader of a long article.
  8. Those navigation numbers are very clearly coded to show which page is active. And the nav number for the active page is NOT linked. We don’t want the user to click and end up right where they started, and we don’t want to “waste” a link that has no real function.
  9. rel=”next” and rel=”prev” link tags are also included in the section h2

Incoming search terms:

Where Am I?

You are currently browsing the SEO Consulting category at Razvan Antonescu.