<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To feed or not to feed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.razvan-antonescu.info/to-feed-or-not-to-feed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.razvan-antonescu.info/to-feed-or-not-to-feed</link>
	<description>Search Engines &#124;&#124;  Information Architecture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 02:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razvan Antonescu  &#187; Rss feeds fixed</title>
		<link>http://www.razvan-antonescu.info/to-feed-or-not-to-feed/comment-page-1#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Razvan Antonescu  &#187; Rss feeds fixed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razvan-antonescu.info/to-feed-or-not-to-feed#comment-254</guid>
		<description>[...] I had a problem with my RSS feed that was set to output only an article summary. Because I previously said that this technique sucks, I finally manage to fix this. Enjoy now the fu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I had a problem with my RSS feed that was set to output only an article summary. Because I previously said that this technique sucks, I finally manage to fix this. Enjoy now the fu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian-Bogdan Andreias</title>
		<link>http://www.razvan-antonescu.info/to-feed-or-not-to-feed/comment-page-1#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian-Bogdan Andreias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razvan-antonescu.info/to-feed-or-not-to-feed#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Good article, valid points.
But as I told you before can you triple-check your &quot;spleling&quot;? :) It hurts when I know you can do better.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, valid points.<br />
But as I told you before can you triple-check your &#8220;spleling&#8221;? <img src='http://www.razvan-antonescu.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It hurts when I know you can do better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Sierra</title>
		<link>http://www.razvan-antonescu.info/to-feed-or-not-to-feed/comment-page-1#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Sierra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.razvan-antonescu.info/to-feed-or-not-to-feed#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Hey Razvan, I really appreciate that you feel this way about my blog! You just made my week ; )

And as for the rest of your post, I completely agree. While I think it&#039;s of course everyone&#039;s decision as to what or how their feed should be, I can&#039;t think of a valid reason (if you&#039;re thinking long-term) for not making it as easy as possible for readers. I guess short-term ad revenue is the main thing...but I don&#039;t see how that would ever be worth being user-unfriendly.

Thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Razvan, I really appreciate that you feel this way about my blog! You just made my week ; )</p>
<p>And as for the rest of your post, I completely agree. While I think it&#8217;s of course everyone&#8217;s decision as to what or how their feed should be, I can&#8217;t think of a valid reason (if you&#8217;re thinking long-term) for not making it as easy as possible for readers. I guess short-term ad revenue is the main thing&#8230;but I don&#8217;t see how that would ever be worth being user-unfriendly.</p>
<p>Thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
